What is an O.R.M (Object-Relational Mapping)

ORM is a technique for converting data between incompatible type systems using object-oriented programming languages. In the context of database management, an ORM provides a way to interact with a database using objects and methods, rather than writing raw SQL queries. This allows for a higher level of abstraction, reducing the amount of repetitive and error-prone code that needs to be written, and making it easier to maintain the application.

ORM and RDBMS

Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) tools and RDBMS have different approaches to querying data.

RDBMS uses SQL which is a low-level, language-agnostic query language that is used to communicate with relational databases. When using SQL, developers write raw SQL statements that are executed directly against the database. The results of the query are then returned in the form of a table or set of tables, which must be manually mapped to objects in code.

On the other hand, an ORM tool abstracts the underlying SQL code, allowing developers to query data using an object-oriented syntax that is similar to the programming language used in the application.

The ORM tool automatically generates the necessary SQL statements and executes them against the database, and then maps the resulting data to objects in code.

One of the main advantages of using an ORM tool is that it eliminates the need for manual data mapping, making it easier for developers to write data-access code and reducing the chances of errors. Additionally, because ORM tools use a higher-level syntax, they can also be more intuitive and easier to use than raw SQL.

However, ORM tools can also introduce performance overhead and complexity, as they must manage the mapping between the database and objects in code. In some cases, raw SQL may still be necessary to achieve the desired performance or to perform complex data manipulation that is not supported by the ORM tool.

As a simple example we will use the database table “customer”. It has four columns:

• id: A unique identifier for each customer, usually an auto-incrementing integer.
• name: The name of the customer, represented as a string.
• email: The email address of the customer, represented as a string.
• address: The address of the customer, represented as a string.

Each row in the table represents a single customer, and each column represents a piece of information about that customer. The table is used to store the data for the customer objects created in the code. The ORM maps the table to a class, allowing you to interact with the data using objects and methods.

Here is an example of how an ORM can map a database table named “customer” to a class representation in C#:

class Customer
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Email { get; set; }
    public string Address { get; set; }
}

// The ORM maps the customer table in the database to the Customer class.
// The columns of the table become properties of the class, and each row in the table becomes an instance of the class.

In this example, the ORM abstracts away the underlying database and provides a high-level, object-oriented interface for working with the data.

The main advantage of using an ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) instead of using the direct results from the database in C# is increased abstraction and convenience. This provides several benefits:

1. Improved readability and maintainability: Code written using an ORM is easier to understand and maintain, as it uses a higher-level, object-oriented interface, rather than raw SQL.
2. Reduced code duplication: With an ORM, you can encapsulate database-related logic in reusable classes and methods, reducing the amount of repetitive code that needs to be written.
3. Increased safety: An ORM can help prevent SQL injection attacks by automatically escaping user input, ensuring that data is safely inserted into the database.
4. Increased flexibility: An ORM provides a layer of abstraction between the application code and the database, allowing you to switch between different database systems without changing the application code.

 

Direct database access

 

var connection = new SqlConnection("connection string");
connection. Open();
var command = new SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM customers", connection);
var reader = command.ExecuteReader();
List < Customer > customers = new List < Customer > ();
while (reader. Read()) {
  var customer = new Customer {
    Id = reader.GetInt32(0),
      Name = reader.GetString(1),
      Email = reader.GetString(2),
      Address = reader.GetString(3)
  };
  customers. Add(customer);
}
reader.Close();
connection. Close();

 

ORM access

 

var customers = ORM.Query<Customer>().ToList();

As you can see, using an ORM simplifies the code and makes it more readable, while also providing additional safety and flexibility benefits.

Different types of O.R.M 

 

Micro O.R.M

 

A micro ORM is a type of Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) library that is designed to be lightweight and simple, offering a minimalistic and easy-to-use interface for interacting with a relational database.

Micro ORMs are typically faster and require less configuration and setup than full-featured ORMs, but also have fewer features and less advanced capabilities.

Micro ORMs provide a higher-level, object-oriented interface for working with databases, allowing you to interact with the data using classes, properties, and methods, rather than writing raw SQL queries as well but they typically offer a smaller, more focused set of features than full-featured ORMs, including support for basic CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations, and often provide basic querying and data mapping capabilities.

Micro ORMs are often used in small projects or in environments where performance is critical. They are also commonly used in microservices and other architectures that prioritize simplicity, scalability, and ease of deployment.

 

Full-fledged Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)

 

A full-fledged Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) is a software library that provides a convenient and efficient way of working with relational databases.

A full-fledged ORM typically has the following characteristics:

1. Object Mapping: The ORM maps database tables to object-oriented classes, allowing developers to interact with the database using objects instead of tables.
2. Query Generation: The ORM generates SQL statements based on the object-oriented query syntax, reducing the need for developers to write and manage raw SQL.
3. Data Validation: The ORM provides built-in data validation and type checking, reducing the risk of incorrect data being written to the database.
4. Caching: The ORM may provide caching of data to improve performance, reducing the number of databases round trips.
5. Transactions: The ORM supports transactions, making it easier to ensure that database operations are atomic and consistent.
6. Database Independence: The ORM is typically designed to be database agnostic, allowing developers to switch between different database platforms without changing the application code.
7. Lazy Loading: The ORM supports lazy loading, which can improve performance by loading related objects only when they are needed.
8. Performance: A comprehensive ORM is crafted to deliver satisfactory performance, and we can customize each aspect of the ORM to enhance its performance. However, it is important to note that a solid understanding of how the ORM operates is necessary to make these customizations effective.

One of the disadvantages of using an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) tool is that you may not be able to create specialized, fine-tuned queries with the same level of precision as you can with raw SQL. This is because ORMs typically abstract the underlying database and expose a higher-level, more object-oriented API for querying data.

For example, it may not be possible to use specific SQL constructs, such as subqueries or window functions, in your ORM queries. Additionally, some ORMs may not provide a way to optimize query performance, such as by specifying index hints or controlling the execution plan.

As a result, developers who need to write specialized or fine-tuned queries may find it easier and more efficient to write raw SQL statements. However, this comes at the cost of having to manually manage the mapping between the database and the application, which is one of the main benefits of using an ORM in the first place.

 

ORM and Querying data

 

Before the existence of LINQ, Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) tools used a proprietary query language to query data. This meant that each ORM had to invent its own criteria or query language, and developers had to learn the specific syntax of each ORM in order to write queries.

For example, in XPO, developers used the Criteria API to write queries. The Criteria API allowed developers to write queries in a type-safe and intuitive manner, but the syntax was specific to XPO and not easily transferable to other ORMs.

Similarly, in NHibernate, developers used the Hibernate Query Language (HQL) to write queries. Like the Criteria API in XPO, HQL was a proprietary query language specific to NHibernate, and developers had to learn the syntax in order to write queries.

This lack of a standardized query language was one of the main limitations of ORMs before the introduction of LINQ. LINQ provided a common, language-agnostic query language that could be used with a variety of data sources, including relational databases. This made it easier for developers to write data-access code, as they only had to learn one query language, regardless of the ORM or data source being used.

 

The introduction of LINQ, a new era for O.R.M in dot net

 

Language Integrated Query (LINQ) is a Microsoft .NET Framework component that was introduced in .NET Framework 3.5. It is a set of language and library features that enables developers to write querying and manipulation operations over data in a more intuitive and readable way.

LINQ was created to address the need for a more unified and flexible approach to querying and manipulating data in .NET applications. Prior to LINQ, developers had to write separate code to access and manipulate data in different data sources, such as databases, XML documents, and in-memory collections. This resulted in a fragmented and difficult-to-maintain codebase, with different syntax and approaches for different data sources.

With LINQ, developers can now write a single querying language that works with a wide range of data sources, including databases, XML, in-memory collections, and more.

In addition, LINQ also provides a number of other benefits, such as improved performance, better type safety, and integrated support for data processing operations, such as filtering, grouping, and aggregating.

 

using (var context = new DbContext())
{
   var selectedCustomers = context.Customers
                                   .Where(c => c.Address.Contains("San Salvador"))
                                   .Select(c => new 
                                   { 
                                       c.Id, 
                                       c.Name, 
                                       c.Email, 
                                       c.Address 
                                   })
                                   .ToList();

    foreach(var customer in selectedCustomers)

    foreach(var customer in selectedCustomers)
    {
        Console.WriteLine($"Id: {customer.Id}, Name: {customer.Name}, Email: {customer.Email}, Address: {customer. Address}");
    }
}

 

And that’s all for this post, until next time ))

We are excited to announce that we are currently in the process of writing a comprehensive book about DevExpress XPO. As we work on this project, we believe it is essential to involve our readers and gather their valuable feedback. Therefore, we have decided to share articles from the book as we complete them, giving you an opportunity to provide input and suggestions that we can consider for inclusion in the final release. Keep in mind that the content presented is subject to change. We greatly appreciate your participation in this collaborative effort.

Related Articles