XPO, One ORM to rule them all

XPO, One ORM to rule them all

Let’s do a quick overview of the main features of XPO before we dive into details.

 

XPO (eXpress Persistent Objects) is a full-featured Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) framework developed by DevExpress. It is used to provide a mapping between the relational database tables and the objects used in a .NET application.

 

XPO allows developers to interact with a database in a more natural, object-oriented manner and eliminates the need to write complex SQL statements. It provides a high-level API for working with databases, automating common tasks such as connecting to a database, querying data, and committing changes.

 

With XPO, developers can focus on the business logic of the application rather than worrying about the low-level details of working with databases.

 

Throughout the book, we will explore each feature of XPO in depth, providing a comprehensive understanding of its capabilities. However, here are some of the most notable features of XPO that we will highlight:

 

  1. Object-Relational Mapping (ORM): XPO provides a mapping between the relational database tables and the objects used in a .NET application. This makes it easier for developers to interact with databases in a more natural, object-oriented manner.
  2. High-Level API: XPO provides a high-level API for working with databases, automating common tasks such as connecting to a database, querying data, and committing changes.
  3. Data Types Mapping: XPO automatically maps .NET data types to their corresponding SQL data types and vice versa, eliminating the need for manual data type conversion.
  4. LINQ Support: XPO includes built-in LINQ (Language Integrated Query) support, making it easier to write complex, fine-tuned queries.
  5. Customizable SQL Generation: XPO allows developers to customize the SQL generated by the framework, providing greater control over the database operations.
  6. Lazy Loading: XPO supports lazy loading, meaning that related objects can be loaded on demand, reducing the amount of data that needs to be loaded at once and improving performance.
  7. Change Tracking: XPO tracks changes made to objects and automatically updates the database as needed, eliminating the need to write manual update statements.
  8. Validation: XPO provides built-in support for validating objects, making it easier to enforce business rules and ensure data integrity.
  9. Caching: XPO provides caching capabilities, allowing frequently used data to be cached and reducing the number of database queries required.
  10. Support for Multiple Databases: XPO supports a wide range of relational databases, including SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and more.

 

Enhancing XPO with Metadata : Annotations

 

In C#, annotations are attributes that can be applied to classes, properties, methods, and other program elements to add metadata or configuration information.

 

In XPO, annotations are used extensively to configure the behavior of persistent classes.

 

XPO provides a number of built-in annotations that can be used to customize the behavior of persistent classes, making it easier to work with relational data using object-oriented programming techniques.

 

Some of the most commonly used annotations include:

 

  • Persistent: Specifies the name of the database table that the persistent class is mapped to.
  • PersistentAlias: Specifies the name of the database column that a property is mapped to.
  • Size: Specifies the maximum size of a database column that a property is mapped to.
  • Key: Marks a property as a key property for the persistent class.
  • NonPersistent: Marks a property as not persistent, meaning it is not mapped to a database column.
  • Association: Specifies the name of a database column that contains a foreign key for a one-to-many or many-to-many relationship.

 

In addition to the built-in annotations, XPO also provides a mechanism for defining custom annotations. You can define a custom annotation by defining a class that is inherited from the Attribute class.

 

Annotations can be applied using a variety of mechanisms, including directly in code, via configuration files, or through attributes on other annotations.

 

We will witness the practical implementation of annotations throughout the book, including our own custom annotations. However, we wanted to introduce them early on as they play a crucial role in the efficient mapping and management of data within XPO.

 

Now that we have refreshed our understanding of XPO’s main goal and features, let’s delve into the “O”, the “R”, and the “M” of an ORM.

And that’s all for this post, until next time ))

We are excited to announce that we are currently in the process of writing a comprehensive book about DevExpress XPO. As we work on this project, we believe it is essential to involve our readers and gather their valuable feedback. Therefore, we have decided to share articles from the book as we complete them, giving you an opportunity to provide input and suggestions that we can consider for inclusion in the final release. Keep in mind that the content presented is subject to change. We greatly appreciate your participation in this collaborative effort.

Related Articles

SOLID design pattern and XPO

What is an O.R.M (Object-Relational Mapping)

ADO The origin of data access in .NET

Relational database systems: the holy grail of data

 

 

SOLID design pattern and XPO

SOLID design pattern and XPO

SOLID is an acronym that stands for five fundamental principles of object-oriented programming and design. These principles were first introduced by Robert C. Martin (also known as Uncle Bob) and have since become a cornerstone of software development best practices. Each letter in SOLID represents a principle that, when applied correctly, leads to more maintainable and modular code.

 

Let’s dive into each of the SOLID principles and understand how they contribute to building high-quality software systems:

 

Single Responsibility Principle (SRP):

The SRP states that a class should have only one reason to change. In other words, a class should have a single responsibility or a single job. This principle encourages developers to break down complex systems into smaller, cohesive modules. By ensuring that each class has a focused responsibility, it becomes easier to understand, test, and modify the code without affecting other parts of the system.

 

Open-Closed Principle (OCP):

The OCP promotes the idea that software entities (classes, modules, functions, etc.) should be open for extension but closed for modification. This principle emphasizes the importance of designing systems that can be easily extended with new functionality without modifying existing code. By relying on abstractions, interfaces, and inheritance, developers can add new features by writing new code rather than changing the existing one. This approach reduces the risk of introducing bugs or unintended side effects.

 

Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP):

The LSP states that objects of a superclass should be replaceable with objects of its subclasses without affecting the correctness of the program. In simpler terms, if a class is a subtype of another class, it should be able to be used interchangeably with its parent class without causing any issues. This principle ensures that inheritance hierarchies are well-designed, avoiding situations where subclass behavior contradicts or breaks the functionality defined by the superclass. Adhering to the LSP leads to more flexible and reusable code.

 

Interface Segregation Principle (ISP):

The ISP advises developers to design interfaces that are specific to the needs of the clients that use them. It suggests that clients should not be forced to depend on interfaces they don’t use. By creating small and focused interfaces, rather than large and monolithic ones, the ISP enables clients to be decoupled from unnecessary dependencies. This principle enhances modularity, testability, and maintainability, as changes to one part of the system are less likely to impact other parts.

 

Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP):

The DIP encourages high-level modules to depend on abstractions rather than concrete implementations. It states that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules; both should depend on abstractions. This principle promotes loose coupling between components, making it easier to substitute or modify dependencies without affecting the overall system. By relying on interfaces or abstract classes, the DIP facilitates extensibility, testability, and the ability to adapt to changing requirements.

 

By applying the SOLID principles, software engineers can create codebases that are modular, flexible, and easy to maintain. These principles provide a roadmap for designing systems that are resilient to change, promote code reusability, and improve collaboration among development teams. SOLID principles are not strict rules but rather guidelines that help developers make informed design decisions and create high-quality software systems.

 

It’s worth mentioning that the SOLID principles should not be applied blindly in all situations. Context matters, and there may be scenarios where strict adherence to one principle might not be the best approach. However, understanding and incorporating these principles into the software design process can significantly improve the overall quality of the codebase.

 

SOLID and XPO

 

XPO is designed with SOLID design principles in mind. Here’s how XPO applies each of the SOLID principles:

 

Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)

 

XPO uses separate classes for each major concern such as mapping, persistence, connection providers, and data access. Each class has a clearly defined purpose and responsibility.

 

Open-Closed Principle (OCP)

 

XPO is extensible and customizable, allowing you to create your own classes and derive them from the XPO base classes. XPO also provides a range of extension points and hooks to allow for customization and extension without modifying the core XPO code.

 

Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)

 

XPO follows this principle by providing a uniform API that works with all persistent objects, regardless of their concrete implementation. This allows you to write code that works with any persistent object, without having to worry about the specific implementation details.

 

Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)

 

XPO provides a number of interfaces that define specific aspects of its behavior, allowing clients to use only the interfaces they need. This reduces the coupling between the clients and the XPO library.

 

Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)

 

XPO was developed prior to the widespread popularity of Dependency Injection (DI) patterns and frameworks.

 

As a result, XPO does not incorporate DI as a built-in feature. However, this does not mean that XPO cannot be used in conjunction with DI. While XPO itself does not provide direct support for DI, you can still integrate it with popular DI containers or frameworks, such as the .NET Core DI container or any other one.

 

By integrating XPO with a DI container, you can leverage the benefits of DI principles in your application while utilizing XPO’s capabilities for database access and mapping. The DI container can handle the creation and management of XPO-related objects, facilitating loose coupling, improved modularity, and simplified testing.

 

A clear example is the XPO Extensions for ASP.NET Core DI:

using DevExpress.Xpo.DB; 
Using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection; // ...

var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args); builder.Services.AddXpoDefaultUnitOfWork(true, options => options.UseConnectionString(builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("MSSqlServer")) .UseAutoCreationOption(AutoCreateOption.DatabaseAndSchema) .UseEntityTypes(new Type[] { typeof(User) }));

More information about XPO and DI here: https://docs.devexpress.com/XPO/403009/connect-to-a-data-store/xpo-extensions-for-aspnet-core-di

And that’s all for this post, until next time ))

We are excited to announce that we are currently in the process of writing a comprehensive book about DevExpress XPO. As we work on this project, we believe it is essential to involve our readers and gather their valuable feedback. Therefore, we have decided to share articles from the book as we complete them, giving you an opportunity to provide input and suggestions that we can consider for inclusion in the final release. Keep in mind that the content presented is subject to change. We greatly appreciate your participation in this collaborative effort.

Related Articles

What is an O.R.M (Object-Relational Mapping)

ADO The origin of data access in .NET

Relational database systems: the holy grail of data

 

What is an O.R.M (Object-Relational Mapping)

What is an O.R.M (Object-Relational Mapping)

ORM is a technique for converting data between incompatible type systems using object-oriented programming languages. In the context of database management, an ORM provides a way to interact with a database using objects and methods, rather than writing raw SQL queries. This allows for a higher level of abstraction, reducing the amount of repetitive and error-prone code that needs to be written, and making it easier to maintain the application.

ORM and RDBMS

Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) tools and RDBMS have different approaches to querying data.

RDBMS uses SQL which is a low-level, language-agnostic query language that is used to communicate with relational databases. When using SQL, developers write raw SQL statements that are executed directly against the database. The results of the query are then returned in the form of a table or set of tables, which must be manually mapped to objects in code.

On the other hand, an ORM tool abstracts the underlying SQL code, allowing developers to query data using an object-oriented syntax that is similar to the programming language used in the application.

The ORM tool automatically generates the necessary SQL statements and executes them against the database, and then maps the resulting data to objects in code.

One of the main advantages of using an ORM tool is that it eliminates the need for manual data mapping, making it easier for developers to write data-access code and reducing the chances of errors. Additionally, because ORM tools use a higher-level syntax, they can also be more intuitive and easier to use than raw SQL.

However, ORM tools can also introduce performance overhead and complexity, as they must manage the mapping between the database and objects in code. In some cases, raw SQL may still be necessary to achieve the desired performance or to perform complex data manipulation that is not supported by the ORM tool.

As a simple example we will use the database table “customer”. It has four columns:

  • id: A unique identifier for each customer, usually an auto-incrementing integer.
  • name: The name of the customer, represented as a string.
  • email: The email address of the customer, represented as a string.
  • address: The address of the customer, represented as a string.

Each row in the table represents a single customer, and each column represents a piece of information about that customer. The table is used to store the data for the customer objects created in the code. The ORM maps the table to a class, allowing you to interact with the data using objects and methods.

Here is an example of how an ORM can map a database table named “customer” to a class representation in C#:

class Customer
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Email { get; set; }
    public string Address { get; set; }
}

// The ORM maps the customer table in the database to the Customer class.
// The columns of the table become properties of the class, and each row in the table becomes an instance of the class.

In this example, the ORM abstracts away the underlying database and provides a high-level, object-oriented interface for working with the data.

The main advantage of using an ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) instead of using the direct results from the database in C# is increased abstraction and convenience. This provides several benefits:

  1. Improved readability and maintainability: Code written using an ORM is easier to understand and maintain, as it uses a higher-level, object-oriented interface, rather than raw SQL.
  2. Reduced code duplication: With an ORM, you can encapsulate database-related logic in reusable classes and methods, reducing the amount of repetitive code that needs to be written.
  3. Increased safety: An ORM can help prevent SQL injection attacks by automatically escaping user input, ensuring that data is safely inserted into the database.
  4. Increased flexibility: An ORM provides a layer of abstraction between the application code and the database, allowing you to switch between different database systems without changing the application code.

 

Direct database access

 

var connection = new SqlConnection("connection string");
connection. Open();
var command = new SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM customers", connection);
var reader = command.ExecuteReader();
List < Customer > customers = new List < Customer > ();
while (reader. Read()) {
  var customer = new Customer {
    Id = reader.GetInt32(0),
      Name = reader.GetString(1),
      Email = reader.GetString(2),
      Address = reader.GetString(3)
  };
  customers. Add(customer);
}
reader.Close();
connection. Close();

 

ORM access

 

var customers = ORM.Query<Customer>().ToList();

As you can see, using an ORM simplifies the code and makes it more readable, while also providing additional safety and flexibility benefits.

Different types of O.R.M 

 

Micro O.R.M

 

A micro ORM is a type of Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) library that is designed to be lightweight and simple, offering a minimalistic and easy-to-use interface for interacting with a relational database.

Micro ORMs are typically faster and require less configuration and setup than full-featured ORMs, but also have fewer features and less advanced capabilities.

Micro ORMs provide a higher-level, object-oriented interface for working with databases, allowing you to interact with the data using classes, properties, and methods, rather than writing raw SQL queries as well but they typically offer a smaller, more focused set of features than full-featured ORMs, including support for basic CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations, and often provide basic querying and data mapping capabilities.

Micro ORMs are often used in small projects or in environments where performance is critical. They are also commonly used in microservices and other architectures that prioritize simplicity, scalability, and ease of deployment.

 

Full-fledged Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)

 

A full-fledged Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) is a software library that provides a convenient and efficient way of working with relational databases.

A full-fledged ORM typically has the following characteristics:

  1. Object Mapping: The ORM maps database tables to object-oriented classes, allowing developers to interact with the database using objects instead of tables.
  2. Query Generation: The ORM generates SQL statements based on the object-oriented query syntax, reducing the need for developers to write and manage raw SQL.
  3. Data Validation: The ORM provides built-in data validation and type checking, reducing the risk of incorrect data being written to the database.
  4. Caching: The ORM may provide caching of data to improve performance, reducing the number of databases round trips.
  5. Transactions: The ORM supports transactions, making it easier to ensure that database operations are atomic and consistent.
  6. Database Independence: The ORM is typically designed to be database agnostic, allowing developers to switch between different database platforms without changing the application code.
  7. Lazy Loading: The ORM supports lazy loading, which can improve performance by loading related objects only when they are needed.
  8. Performance: A comprehensive ORM is crafted to deliver satisfactory performance, and we can customize each aspect of the ORM to enhance its performance. However, it is important to note that a solid understanding of how the ORM operates is necessary to make these customizations effective.

One of the disadvantages of using an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) tool is that you may not be able to create specialized, fine-tuned queries with the same level of precision as you can with raw SQL. This is because ORMs typically abstract the underlying database and expose a higher-level, more object-oriented API for querying data.

For example, it may not be possible to use specific SQL constructs, such as subqueries or window functions, in your ORM queries. Additionally, some ORMs may not provide a way to optimize query performance, such as by specifying index hints or controlling the execution plan.

As a result, developers who need to write specialized or fine-tuned queries may find it easier and more efficient to write raw SQL statements. However, this comes at the cost of having to manually manage the mapping between the database and the application, which is one of the main benefits of using an ORM in the first place.

 

ORM and Querying data

 

Before the existence of LINQ, Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) tools used a proprietary query language to query data. This meant that each ORM had to invent its own criteria or query language, and developers had to learn the specific syntax of each ORM in order to write queries.

For example, in XPO, developers used the Criteria API to write queries. The Criteria API allowed developers to write queries in a type-safe and intuitive manner, but the syntax was specific to XPO and not easily transferable to other ORMs.

Similarly, in NHibernate, developers used the Hibernate Query Language (HQL) to write queries. Like the Criteria API in XPO, HQL was a proprietary query language specific to NHibernate, and developers had to learn the syntax in order to write queries.

This lack of a standardized query language was one of the main limitations of ORMs before the introduction of LINQ. LINQ provided a common, language-agnostic query language that could be used with a variety of data sources, including relational databases. This made it easier for developers to write data-access code, as they only had to learn one query language, regardless of the ORM or data source being used.

 

The introduction of LINQ, a new era for O.R.M in dot net

 

Language Integrated Query (LINQ) is a Microsoft .NET Framework component that was introduced in .NET Framework 3.5. It is a set of language and library features that enables developers to write querying and manipulation operations over data in a more intuitive and readable way.

LINQ was created to address the need for a more unified and flexible approach to querying and manipulating data in .NET applications. Prior to LINQ, developers had to write separate code to access and manipulate data in different data sources, such as databases, XML documents, and in-memory collections. This resulted in a fragmented and difficult-to-maintain codebase, with different syntax and approaches for different data sources.

With LINQ, developers can now write a single querying language that works with a wide range of data sources, including databases, XML, in-memory collections, and more.

In addition, LINQ also provides a number of other benefits, such as improved performance, better type safety, and integrated support for data processing operations, such as filtering, grouping, and aggregating.

 

using (var context = new DbContext())
{
   var selectedCustomers = context.Customers
                                   .Where(c => c.Address.Contains("San Salvador"))
                                   .Select(c => new 
                                   { 
                                       c.Id, 
                                       c.Name, 
                                       c.Email, 
                                       c.Address 
                                   })
                                   .ToList();

    foreach(var customer in selectedCustomers)

    foreach(var customer in selectedCustomers)
    {
        Console.WriteLine($"Id: {customer.Id}, Name: {customer.Name}, Email: {customer.Email}, Address: {customer. Address}");
    }
}

 

And that’s all for this post, until next time ))

We are excited to announce that we are currently in the process of writing a comprehensive book about DevExpress XPO. As we work on this project, we believe it is essential to involve our readers and gather their valuable feedback. Therefore, we have decided to share articles from the book as we complete them, giving you an opportunity to provide input and suggestions that we can consider for inclusion in the final release. Keep in mind that the content presented is subject to change. We greatly appreciate your participation in this collaborative effort.

Related Articles

ADO The origin of data access in .NET

Relational database systems: the holy grail of data

 

ADO The origin of data access in .NET

ADO The origin of data access in .NET

.NET communicates with a database using ADO.NET, which provides a set of classes and interfaces for accessing and manipulating data stored in a database.

ADO.NET supports various database systems, including relational databases and XML databases.

ADO.NET uses the following protocols to communicate with a database:

1. OLE DB (Object Linking and Embedding, Database) – This is a low-level, component-based API that provides a generic interface for accessing various types of data sources, including relational databases, spreadsheet data, and more.

2. ODBC (Open Database Connectivity) – This is a widely used API for accessing relational databases. It provides a standardized interface for accessing data, regardless of the underlying database management system.

3. ADO.NET Provider – This is a high-level, .NET-based API for accessing data stored in a specific database management system, such as Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, or MySQL.

The choice of protocol used by ADO.NET to communicate with a database depends on the specific requirements of the application and the database management system being used.

The ADO.NET provider approach is the most common and provides a flexible and scalable solution for accessing and manipulating data stored in a database, supporting a wide range of database systems and communication protocols.

ADO.NET Main Components

The main classes in ADO.NET include:

1. Connection – Represents a connection to a database, providing methods for opening and closing a connection and for executing commands against the database.

2. Command – Represents a database command, such as a SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE statement, and provides methods for executing the command and for retrieving the results of the command.

3. DataReader – Provides a forward-only, read-only view of the results of a command. The DataReader is optimized for retrieving large amounts of data from a database, as it retrieves data in a streaming manner, rather than retrieving all data into memory at once.

4. DataAdapter – Represents a set of data commands and a database connection that are used to fill a DataSet and to resolve changes made to the data back to the database. The DataAdapter is often used in combination with a DataSet to provide a flexible and scalable way to access and manipulate data stored in a database.

5. DataSet – Represents an in-memory cache of data, providing a disconnected view of data that can be used to work with data independently of a database connection. The DataSet provides a rich set of features for manipulating and querying data, including support for relationships between tables, constraints, and transactions.

6. Parameter – Represents a parameter for a database command, providing a way to specify input values for a command, such as the values for parameters in a stored procedure.

These are the main classes in ADO.NET, and they provide a comprehensive and flexible set of tools for accessing and manipulating data stored in a database.

Design problems in ADO.NET 1

ADO.NET 1 refers to the first version of ADO.NET, which was introduced in .NET Framework 1.0, released in 2002. In this version of ADO.NET, data access was performed using direct methods and properties of the various ADO.NET classes, such as SqlConnection and SqlCommand for SQL Server.

The main design problem for ADO.NET 1 is that it requires developers to write database-specific code for each database management system that they wanted to access.

ADO.NET 2 and the DbProviderFactory

With the introduction of .NET Framework 2.0 in 2005, the ADO.NET DbProviderFactory was introduced.

The DbProviderFactory abstract class provides a set of methods for creating database-specific implementations of various ADO.NET classes, such as DbConnection, DbCommand, and DbDataAdapter, and makes it easier for developers to write database-agnostic code.

ADO.NET DbProviderFactory is a factory pattern that provides a standard way to create instances of database-specific classes, such as connection and command classes, in ADO.NET.

The DbProviderFactory is used by the ADO.NET data providers, such as the SqlClient data provider for SQL Server, the OleDb data provider for OLE DB data sources, and the ODBC data provider for ODBC data sources, to provide a common way to create instances of the classes that they implement. This makes it easier for developers to switch between different data providers and to write database-agnostic code that can work with different databases without modification.

The introduction of DbProviderFactory in ADO.NET was an exceptional milestone that revolutionized database access in .NET. By providing a standardized interface for creating database-specific connection objects, DbProviderFactory enhanced the flexibility and portability of data access code. Its ingenious design allowed developers to write data access logic without being tightly coupled to a specific database provider, thereby promoting code reusability and adaptability. This breakthrough was the steppingstone to the emergence and widespread adoption of Object-Relational Mapping Systems (ORMs).

ORMs leveraged DbProviderFactory’s capabilities to abstract the complexities of database interactions and map database entities to object-oriented representations seamlessly. As a result, developers could focus more on business logic and application development rather than dealing with low-level data access intricacies.

The symbiotic relationship between DbProviderFactory and ORMs continues to shape modern software development, empowering developers with powerful tools to efficiently manage and manipulate data in a database-agnostic manner.

Until next time ))

We are excited to announce that we are currently in the process of writing a comprehensive book about DevExpress XPO. As we work on this project, we believe it is essential to involve our readers and gather their valuable feedback. Therefore, we have decided to share articles from the book as we complete them, giving you an opportunity to provide input and suggestions that we can consider for inclusion in the final release. Keep in mind that the content presented is subject to change. We greatly appreciate your participation in this collaborative effort.

Related Articles

Relational database systems: the holy grail of data

 

Relational database systems: the holy grail of data

Relational database systems: the holy grail of data

RDBMS stands for Relational Database Management System. It is a type of database management system that is based on the relational model, which organizes data into tables with rows and columns, and uses relationships between tables to link data together.

In an RDBMS, data is stored in tables, with each table representing a specific type of data (such as customers, orders, or products). Each table has columns that represent the attributes of the data, and rows that represent individual instances of the data. Relationships between tables can be established using keys, allowing data from multiple tables to be linked and retrieved in a single query.

RDBMSs provide a variety of features and tools for managing, querying, and manipulating data stored in the database, including data validation, constraint enforcement, transaction management, backup and recovery, reporting and analysis capabilities. They are widely used in enterprise applications, web applications, and other systems that require the management of large amounts of structured data.

Examples of popular RDBMSs include Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, and PostgreSQL.

A Relational Database Management System (RDBMS) uses Data Manipulation Language (DML) and Data Definition Language (DDL) queries to interact with the data stored in the database. The specific syntax of the queries will vary depending on the database system being used.

DML queries are used to retrieve, insert, update, and delete data in the database. The most used DML queries are:

  • SELECT: Retrieves data from one or more tables in the database.
  • INSERT: Adds a new row of data to a table in the database.
  • UPDATE: Modifies existing data in a table in the database.
  • DELETE: Deletes data from a table in the database.

DDL queries are used to create, modify, and delete database structures, such as tables, indexes, and constraints. The most used DDL queries are:

  • CREATE: Creates a new database object, such as a table or index.
  • ALTER: Modifies the structure of an existing database object.
  • DROP: Deletes a database object.

 

For example, the following is a DDL query to create a table named customers:

CREATE TABLE customers (

  id INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,

  name VARCHAR(255),

  email VARCHAR(255),

  address VARCHAR(255)

);

 

And the following is a DML query to insert a new customer into the customers table:

INSERT INTO customers (name, email, address)

VALUES ('John Doe', 'johndoe@example.com', '123 Main St');

In the next article we will be talking about the origin of data access in net framework  a.k.a ADO.NET

See you then )))

We are excited to announce that we are currently in the process of writing a comprehensive book about DevExpress XPO. As we work on this project, we believe it is essential to involve our readers and gather their valuable feedback. Therefore, we have decided to share articles from the book as we complete them, giving you an opportunity to provide input and suggestions that we can consider for inclusion in the final release. Keep in mind that the content presented is subject to change. We greatly appreciate your participation in this collaborative effort.